ArticlePloS one2025
Study on the effect of cementation solution concentration on sand fixation by fiber reinforced MICP.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study systematically investigates the influence of cementation solution concentration on the sand fixation effect induced by palm fiber-enhanced microorganisms through microbial induced calcium carbonate precipitation (MICP), aiming to optimize its application in ecological restoration and engineering reinforcement. A series of experiments including unconfined compressive strength tests, direct shear tests, permeability tests, nuclear magnetic resonance analysis, calcium carbonate content determination, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) evaluates the mechanical properties, permeability, and microstructural characteristics of MICP-treated sand under varying cementation concentrations ranging from 0.2 to 0.7 mol/L. Results show that a concentration of 0.5 mol/L yields the best mechanical performance, with significantly higher unconfined compressive strength (666.65 kPa) and shear strength compared to other concentrations. At lower concentrations from 0.2 to 0.4 mol/L, increasing the concentration enhances calcium carbonate deposition, which improves mechanical properties and reduces both permeability coefficient and porosity. In contrast, higher concentrations above 0.5 mol/L inhibit microbial enzymatic activity, leading to reduced calcium carbonate content and mechanical strength, along with increased permeability and porosity. Microscopic analysis reveals that at 0.5 mol/L, calcium carbonate crystals form densely and uniformly, effectively filling pore spaces and strengthening inter-particle bonding. Therefore, 0.5 mol/L represents an optimal balance between performance and cost, reducing resource waste while ensuring mechanical enhancement and supporting applications in sand dune stabilization, windbreaks, sand fixation, and ecological vegetation restoration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.