Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788951›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Evaluation of coseismic landslide susceptibility by combining Newmark model and XGBoost algorithm.

Cong Zhang, Zifa Wang, Jintao Xiao, Zhaodong Wang, Dengke Zhao, Zhaoyan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cong ZhangSchool of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Zifa WangInstitute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1288-5032
Jintao XiaoSchool of Civil and Architecture Engineering, Henan University, Kaifeng, China.
Zhaodong WangInstitute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China.
Dengke ZhaoInstitute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China.
Zhaoyan LiInstitute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coseismic landslides are among the most perilous geological disasters in hilly places after earthquakes. Precise assessment of coseismic landslide susceptibility is crucial for forecasting the effects of landslides and alleviating subsequent tragedies. This research formulates a comprehensive landslide hazard assessment model by integrating the Newmark physical model with machine learning techniques. The Jiuzhaigou region serves as the study area, utilizing the comprehensive indicator [Formula: see text] from the Newmark model as a principal feature parameter, which integrates several influencing aspects, including rock strata, moisture content, and slope gradient. Monte Carlo simulations (MCS) mitigate uncertainty in geotechnical parameters, augmenting Newmark model findings' reliability. The sampling approach utilizes Newmark model outcomes to identify nonlandslide locations for developing six landslide susceptibility models, namely N_XGB, N_RF, Dn_XGB, Dn_RF, and independent XGBoost and RF models. Comparative investigation reveals that the hybrid models N_XGB and N_RF, which amalgamate Newmark model outputs with machine learning methodologies, have enhanced performance. The N_XGB model attains superior accuracy, exhibiting an AUC of 0.96 in the Jiuzhaigou region, markedly surpassing alternative hybrid machine learning models and physical models, moreover, [Formula: see text] as a feature exhibits superior predictive accuracy relative to utilizing Newmark displacement. Validation in the Ludian and Luding region results in model accuracies of 0.88 and 0.86, respectively, indicating robust generalizability across various seismic situations. These findings highlight the benefits of integrating physical principles with data-driven methodologies, providing a comprehensive regional landslide risk assessment and management framework.

Identifiers

PMID40788951
PMCPMC12338814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.