Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788943›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest based on the etiology of cardiac arrest; A scoping review.

Sedigheh Shaeri, Julie Considine, Katie N Dainty, Theresa Mariero Olasveengen, Laurie J Morrison

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sedigheh ShaeriInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1210-0541
Julie ConsidineSchool of Nursing and Midwifery and Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research in the Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3801-2456
Katie N DaintyInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-8813
Theresa Mariero OlasveengenDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Oslo University Hospital, and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Laurie J MorrisonInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDisparity is believed to exist between generic Utstein etiological classifications of 2004 and 2015 when compared with confirmed etiologies, but the impact of this disparity on reported survival outcomes is unknown.

objectiveThis scoping review was proposed with two objectives: 1-to report outcomes based on confirmed etiology of OHCA in comparison with Utstein classified etiologies and 2- to identify outcomes of OHCA by etiology following cause-targeted interventions.

methodMedline, Embase, and EBM- Cochrane databases were searched from inception to 2024. Studies were selected if included population was adults with OHCA for whom survival outcomes of OHCA were reported based on the confirmed etiology compared to Utstein etiological classification (2004 or 2015) or reported based on the etiology following cause-targeted interventions. A descriptive review of included studies was conducted.

resultThe search yielded 24,833 citations. Thirty-nine studies met inclusion criteria. These articles were predominantly published in Europe and North America between 2010-2024. The Utstein etiological classification was used in all studies (Utstein 2004; n = 31, Utstein 2015; n = 8). Survival to discharge was higher for drug overdose induced OHCA than presumed cardiac etiologies (9-83% vs 8.3-63%). For confirmed etiology of drowning, 30-day survival was higher than the rate reported by presumed cardiac etiologies (Utstein 2004) (11.5% vs 8.8%) while survival to discharge was lower following confirmed etiologies of trauma (1.7-5.1% vs 8-12%), hanging (3.3-43% vs 12-61%), respiratory disease (5% vs 9%), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) (11% vs 40%) compared with Utestin etiological classifications (2004 or 2015). Thrombolysis therapy resulted in better 30-day survival compared to placebo for OHCA due to presumed pulmonary embolism (16% vs 6%; p = 0.05), and conventional resuscitation resulted in higher survival for OHCA due to drowning (10.5% vs 8.6%) or respiratory disease (6.8% vs 4.54%) versus chest compression only.

conclusionThe reported survival outcomes for confirmed non-cardiac etiologies is inconsistent across studies compared with Utstein etiological classifications of 2004 or 2015. Better survival outcomes following few cause-targeted interventions may be attributed to etiologically well-defined patient cohorts. More vigorous case selection based on etiology may refine the reported outcomes and comparisons with interventions across published studies.

Indexed as

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestCardiopulmonary ResuscitationEmergency Medical ServicesHumansTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID40788943
PMCPMC12338839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.