Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788932›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Cryo-EM ligand building using AlphaFold3-like model and molecular dynamics.

Nandan Haloi, Rebecca J Howard, Erik Lindahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nandan HaloiDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3542-333X
Rebecca J HowardDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erik LindahlDepartment of Applied Physics, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-2794

Funding

BioExcel-3 Centre-of-ExcellenceKnut and Alice Wallenberg foundationMarie Sklodowska-Curie Postdoctoral FellowshipSwedish Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Resolving protein-ligand interactions in atomic detail is key to understanding how small molecules regulate macromolecular function. Although recent breakthroughs in cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) have enabled high-quality reconstruction of numerous complex biomolecules, the resolution of bound ligands is often relatively poor. Furthermore, methods for building and refining molecular models into cryo-EM maps have largely focused on proteins and may not be optimized for the diverse properties of small-molecule ligands. Here, we present an approach that integrates artificial intelligence (AI) with cryo-EM density-guided simulations to fit ligands into experimental maps. Using three inputs: 1) a protein amino acid sequence, 2) a ligand specification, and 3) an experimental cryo-EM map, we validated our approach on a set of biomedically relevant protein-ligand complexes including kinases, GPCRs, and solute transporters, none of which were present in the AI training data. In cases for which AI was not sufficient to predict experimental poses outright, integration of flexible fitting into molecular dynamics simulations improved ligand model-to-map cross-correlation relative to the deposited structure from 40-71% to 82-95%. This work offers a straightforward pipeline for integrating AI and density-guided simulations to model building in cryo-EM maps of ligand-protein complexes.

Indexed as

Cryoelectron MicroscopyMolecular Dynamics SimulationProteinsComputational BiologyLigandsProtein BindingProtein ConformationLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID40788932
PMCPMC12364316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.