ArticlePloS one2025
Cold atmospheric plasma improves antifungal responsiveness of Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium keratoplasticum conidia and mycelia.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A dual-index framework for cold atmospheric plasma dosing: A meta-analysis of parametric control from volumetric redox flux to redox homeostatic status.Redox biology · 2026Pooled it
- Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Biomedicine and Pharmacology: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Therapeutic Applications.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Condensation of fluconazole and zinc undecylanate particles using low-pressure RF plasma: a novel drug combination approach.BMC pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate sublethal cold atmospheric plasma (CAP) treatment of filamentous fungal pathogen susceptibility to commonly used antifungal drugs in vitro. Response to CAP in combination with voriconazole, fluconazole, amphotericin B, and caspofungin was evaluated in Aspergillus flavus and Fusarium keratoplasticum conidia and mycelium; conidial response to fluconazole was also assessed in three strains of F. falciforme. Conidial susceptibility to antifungal drugs alone or in combination with CAP was assessed using a modified CLSI broth microdilution assay with MIC determination and colony-forming unit (CFU) enumeration. Mycelial viability and biofilm thickness changes in response to antifungal drugs alone or in combination with CAP were assessed over 24 hours post treatment. CAP enhanced antifungal drug efficacy against all fungal species, though effects differed by drug and growth form. CAP enhanced antifungal drug susceptibility in conidia, with the strongest effect observed for F. keratoplasticum conidia, where caspofungin MIC decreased fourfold (from 16 to 4-8 μg/mL) and sensitivity to fluconazole, which exerted no effect in absence of CAP, was restored when combined with sublethal CAP treatment. In A. flavus, CAP lowered the MIC of voriconazole (from 0.25 to 0.06-0.125 μg/mL) but increased the MIC of amphotericin B (from 4 to >4 μg/mL), despite reductions in viable cell counts. Differential responses to CAP and fluconazole were observed across three strains of F. falciforme, suggesting variability in CAP response. In treated biofilms, CAP alone initially reduced mycelial viability and biofilm thickness, but partial recovery of the fungus was observed over time in most cases. When combined with antifungal drugs, CAP significantly enhanced reduction of mycelial viability and thickness beyond antifungal treatment alone. In F. keratoplasticum biofilms, the combination of CAP and antifungal drugs produced sustained reductions in mycelial viability and biofilm thickness, whereas A. flavus biofilms were more resistant to CAP treatment and exhibited consistent recovery after 24 hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.