Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788915›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Performance of older adults on MTL- BR Battery: ARE There differences in healthy aging? A pilot study.

Julia Prado Caieiro da Costa, Marcela Lima Silagi, Karin Zazo Ortiz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia Prado Caieiro da CostaDepartment of Language, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0831-494X
Marcela Lima SilagiDepartment of Language, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Karin Zazo OrtizDepartment of Language, Speech and Hearing Sciences, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0796-3948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCharacterize and better understand differences that can occur in performing language tasks with advancing age in order to observe if the current norms of MTL-BR Battery obtained with individuals up 75 years of age could also be applied to old-old-individuals.

methods80 participants, stratified into two age groups: 40 individuals aged 60-75 and 40 individuals aged 76-90 years, were submitted to an extensive language assessment by Montreal Toulouse Language Battery-Brazilian version (MTL-BR).

resultsA statistically significant difference was found between both groups on the tasks of oral comprehension of sentences, narrative discourse (oral and written), written dictation, repetition of words, reading aloud of sentences and numbers, verbal naming and written numerical calculation. DISCUSSION: The study showed that aging negatively affected performance on some language tasks. The results obtained in all tasks may be useful for comparative analyses in the clinical evaluation of old-old individuals with language complaints submitted to the MTL-BR Battery. On the one hand, subtests that typically exhibit ceiling effects in healthy populations, if found to be impaired, may clearly indicate the presence of a language disorder. On the other hand, data related to tasks that showed age-related differences should be interpreted with caution. In this sense, the data obtained on the performance of old-old individuals may guide the interpretation of the language assessment using the MTL-BR Battery or similar language assessment procedures.

Indexed as

AgingHealthy AgingLanguage TestsAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilComprehensionFemaleHumansLanguageMaleMiddle AgedPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID40788915
PMCPMC12338805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.