Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788909›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Advanced MDCT assessment of abdominal aortic wall integrity and morphometry in the Saudi cohort: A single-centre cross-sectional study.

Mohammad Ahmad Mostafa Alloush, Mazin Babikir Hassib, Husain Alturkistani, Rafat S Mohtasib, Rashed Ali Alhamed, Reham Mukhlid Almutairi, Mohammed J Alsaadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohammad Ahmad Mostafa AlloushDepartment of Medical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8812-3289
Mazin Babikir HassibUniversity of Hail, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology Department, Hail, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6316-5038
Husain AlturkistaniDepartment of Radiology & Medical Imaging, College of Medicine - King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2808-2696
Rafat S MohtasibDepartment of Medical School, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9041-2177
Rashed Ali AlhamedMedical Imaging Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7881-6723
Reham Mukhlid AlmutairiMedical Imaging Administration, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1281-2615
Mohammed J AlsaadiRadiology and Medical Imaging Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences in Al-Kharj, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0560-0403

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate reference values for abdominal aortic dimensions and wall thickness are crucial for the early detection and management of vascular diseases, particularly abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, there is a lack of population-specific normative data for the Saudi population.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted on 347 adults [111 males, 236 females] aged 20-80 at King Fahad Medical City. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was utilised to measure the abdominal aortic lumen area, diameter, and wall thickness at three standard anatomical levels. Pixel-based segmentation and image analysis using MATLAB allowed for precise quantification of wall thickness. Multiple linear regression was employed to assess associations with age, gender, and BMI.

resultsThe average diameter of the aorta was 1.87 cm, the average wall thickness was 1.6 mm, and the average lumen area was 3.01 cm². Males generally had thicker aortic walls and larger dimensions than females, particularly in younger age groups. However, these gender differences became less pronounced with older age and increased BMI. A higher BMI was strongly linked to thicker aortic walls (p < 0.001) but was also associated with a reduced lumen area (p < 0.001). Importantly, aortic diameter did not significantly influence wall thickness.

conclusionThis study provides essential normative data for abdominal aortic measurements in the Saudi population, highlighting age and BMI as significant influencers of aortic morphology. The results support the adoption of population-specific diagnostic criteria and demonstrate the utility of advanced MDCT-based measurement techniques in vascular assessment.

Indexed as

Aorta, AbdominalMultidetector Computed TomographyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAortic Aneurysm, AbdominalBody Mass IndexCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSaudi ArabiaYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40788909
PMCPMC12338765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.