Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788894›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Impact of deep learning and post-processing algorithms performances on biodiversity metrics assessed on videos.

Valentine Fleuré, Kévin Planolles, Thomas Claverie, Baptiste Mulot, Sébastien Villéger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Valentine FleuréMARBEC, University Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6567-1986
Kévin PlanollesMARBEC, University Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Thomas ClaverieUMR ENTROPIE, IRD, IFREMER, CNRS, Univ La Réunion, Saint Denis, Réunion, France.
Baptiste MulotZooParc de Beauval & Beauval Nature, Saint-Aignan, France.
Sébastien VillégerMARBEC, University Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing the escalating biodiversity crisis, driven by climate change, habitat destruction, and exploitation, necessitates efficient monitoring strategies to assess species presence and abundance across diverse habitats. Video-based surveys using remote cameras are a promising, non-invasive way to collect valuable data in various environments. Yet, the analysis of recorded videos remains challenging due to time and expertise constraints. Recent advances in deep learning models have enhanced image processing capabilities in both object detection and classification. However, the impacts on models' performances and usage on assessment of biodiversity metrics on videos is yet to be assessed. This study evaluates the impacts of video processing rates, detection and identification model performance, and post-processing algorithms on the accuracy of biodiversity metrics, using simulated remote videos of fish communities and 14,406 simulated automated processing pipelines. We found that a processing rate of one image per second minimizes errors while ensuring detection of all species. However, even near-perfect detection (both recall and precision of 0.99) and identification (accuracy of 0.99) models resulted in overestimation of total abundance, species richness and species diversity due to false positives. We reveal that post-processing model outputs using a confidence threshold approach (i.e., to discard most erroneous predictions while also discarding a smaller proportion of correct predictions) is the most efficient method to accurately estimate biodiversity from videos.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsBiodiversityDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedVideo RecordingAnimalsEcosystemFishes

Identifiers

PMID40788894
PMCPMC12338835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.