ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of deep learning and post-processing algorithms performances on biodiversity metrics assessed on videos.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing the escalating biodiversity crisis, driven by climate change, habitat destruction, and exploitation, necessitates efficient monitoring strategies to assess species presence and abundance across diverse habitats. Video-based surveys using remote cameras are a promising, non-invasive way to collect valuable data in various environments. Yet, the analysis of recorded videos remains challenging due to time and expertise constraints. Recent advances in deep learning models have enhanced image processing capabilities in both object detection and classification. However, the impacts on models' performances and usage on assessment of biodiversity metrics on videos is yet to be assessed. This study evaluates the impacts of video processing rates, detection and identification model performance, and post-processing algorithms on the accuracy of biodiversity metrics, using simulated remote videos of fish communities and 14,406 simulated automated processing pipelines. We found that a processing rate of one image per second minimizes errors while ensuring detection of all species. However, even near-perfect detection (both recall and precision of 0.99) and identification (accuracy of 0.99) models resulted in overestimation of total abundance, species richness and species diversity due to false positives. We reveal that post-processing model outputs using a confidence threshold approach (i.e., to discard most erroneous predictions while also discarding a smaller proportion of correct predictions) is the most efficient method to accurately estimate biodiversity from videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.