ArticlePloS one2025
Reading with deaf eyes: Automatic activation of speech-based phonology during word recognition is task dependent.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Avoiding unintended consequences: science of reading policies may harm deaf children.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2026Article
- Reading ability in both deaf and hearing adults is linked to neural representations of abstract phonology derived from visual speech.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Literacy levels are highly variable within the deaf population and, compared to the general population, on average, reading levels are lower. As speech-based phonological coding is a known predictor of reading success in hearing individuals, much research has focussed on deaf readers' processing of speech-based phonological codes during word recognition and reading as a possible explanation for the widespread reading difficulties in the deaf population. Although results are mixed, there is recent growing evidence that deaf and hearing readers process speech-based phonological codes differently. Furthermore, some studies indicate that phonological ability may not be a strong correlate of literacy skills in deaf, adult readers. Here, we investigate orthographic, semantic, and phonological processing during single word reading in deaf (N = 20) and hearing (N = 20) adult readers, who were matched on reading level. Specifically, we tracked deaf and hearing readers' eye-movements using an adaptation of the visual world paradigm using written words and pictures. We found that deaf and hearing readers activate orthographic and semantic information following a similar time-course. However, there were differences in the way the groups processed phonology, with deaf readers making less use of phonological information. Crucially, as both groups were matched for reading level, reduced phonological processing did not appear to impact reading skill in deaf readers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.