ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Reevaluating diagnostic confidence: the impact of delayed excretory phase imaging in CT urography on detecting renal and urinary tract abnormalities.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Deep learning reconstruction accelerated reduced field-of-view DWI in rectal cancer: mucosa-submucosa-muscularis visualization and T staging.European radiology experimental · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the diagnostic value of the delayed excretory phase in computed tomography urography (CTU) for detecting renal and urinary tract abnormalities and its impact on readers' confidence in patients with hematuria, given concerns about radiation exposure, cost, and limited added benefit.
methodsThis IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant retrospective cross-sectional study included 489 CTU exams performed at a quaternary center between 2012 and 2023. Each scan included non-contrast, nephrographic, and delayed phases. Six radiologists with varying experience independently reviewed exams in two sessions: Session 1 (without delayed phase) and Session 2 (with delayed phase), separated by a minimum three-week washout period. Abnormalities were assessed using standardized criteria; diagnostic confidence was rated (0-100%). Analyses included McNemar's test, mixed-effects logistic regressions, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; p < 0.05 was statistically significant.
resultsNo significant differences were found in detecting most abnormalities between sessions. Cystic renal masses were more often detected in Session 1 (p = 0.05, OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 0.99-1.98). Detection increased in Session 2 for renal (p = 0.002, OR = 0.35) and ureteral congenital anomalies (p = 0.004, OR = 0.30). Intermediate-experience readers had lower odds of detecting renal (OR = 0.09) and cystic masses (OR = 0.08); experienced readers missed more ureteral anomalies (OR = 0.21). Delayed imaging did not improve overall detection or reader performance. Diagnostic confidence was lower in Session 2 (p < 0.001), particularly among less experienced readers.
conclusionThe delayed excretory phase in CTU modestly improved detection of congenital anomalies but did not enhance identification of ureteral or bladder lesions or diagnostic confidence. Selective use may reduce radiation exposure without compromising diagnostic performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788575What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.