Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788565›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2025

Pattern of recurrence with 1.0 cm CTV in brain glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy.

Erica L Braschi, Olivia Trumble, Anthony Casper, Robert J Amdur, Christopher G Morris, Alexandra N De Leo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erica L BraschiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2000 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0385, USA.
Olivia TrumbleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2000 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0385, USA.
Anthony CasperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2000 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0385, USA.
Robert J AmdurDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2000 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0385, USA.
Christopher G MorrisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2000 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0385, USA.
Alexandra N De LeoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida College of Medicine, 2000 SW Archer Road, PO Box 100385, Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0385, USA. lopeal@shands.ufl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-2910

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeHistorically, clinical target volume (CTV) expansions for glioblastoma (GBM) have ranged from 2 to 3 cm. Since 2017, our institution has adopted a 1 cm CTV expansion beyond the gross tumor volume (GTV) and postoperative cavity on contrast-enhanced T1 Magnetic Resonance (MR) scan. Our study evaluates recurrence patterns using this approach.

methodsWe identified 50 patients who developed tumor recurrence following treatment between 01/01/2017-01/31/2024 at our institution. All patients underwent maximal safe resection followed by standard chemoradiation with 60 Gy in 30 fractions, though dose reductions to 59.4 Gy-54 Gy were permitted to meet organ-at-risk constraints. All but three patients received concurrent temozolomide. Radiotherapy target volumes were defined as follows: GTV included gross tumor and postoperative cavity on contrast-enhanced T1 MR, CTV included GTV plus a 1 cm expansion (edited for anatomical barriers), and the planning target volume included a 2 mm expansion beyond the CTV. Recurrences were classified based on the recurrence volume within the 100% isodose: in-field (> 80%), marginal (20-80%), and distant (< 20%).

resultsRecurrence patterns were as follows: 80% (40/50) in-field alone, 10% (5/50) in-field and distant, 8% (4/50) distant alone, and 2% (1/50) marginal alone. The single marginal recurrence had 52% of its volume within the 100% isodose.

conclusionsIn GBM patients treated with a 1 cm CTV margin on the gross tumor and postoperative cavity on contrast-enhanced T1 MR, we observed a very low marginal recurrence (2%). These findings support the continued use of a 1 cm CTV expansion at our institution.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesContouringGlioblastomaRadiation therapyRecurrence patterns

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.