Observational studyJournal of robotic surgery2025
Korean essentials of robotic surgery (KEROS) program for novice robotic surgeons: evaluating the educational impact and participant satisfaction of simulation training for developing robotic surgical skills.
Observational study in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Robotic Surgical Training in the Northern Deanery: A trainee-led evaluation in line with GIRFT recommendations.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAs robotic surgery expands, standardized training is crucial for novice robotic surgeons. The Korean Essentials of Robotic Surgery (KEROS) program, developed by the Korean Society of Endo-laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, offers such training. This study evaluates KEROS's educational effectiveness and participant satisfaction.
methodsSurgeons applied online for this prospective observational study. The KEROS program was conducted in 2023 and covered hepatobiliary-pancreatic (HBP), colorectal (CR), and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) divisions. Training included SimNow simulation, practice using synthetic models (Step I), and practice using a porcine model (Step II). Baseline experience was assessed via questionnaires. Objective surgical skillfulness was evaluated using structured checklists, and satisfaction was measured using Likert-scale surveys.
resultsThirty-six surgeons participated. Baseline data revealed that 40% of the participants had no prior robotic training, and 50% had no first-assistant experience. Participants reported high satisfaction with the program's components, particularly the Step II animal model training, which was highly rated for realism and skill enhancement. The SimNow simulator was rated helpful for understanding the concept of using a third arm, finding a comfortable hand position using the clutch, and improving camera control skills. Questionnaire responses demonstrated reliable internal consistency (Cronbach index 0.69-0.85). Post-training, objective assessments using checklists during Step II animal model training revealed significant skill proficiency across all divisions (mean score: HBP 30.1/36, CR 85.4/100, UGI 82.3/100).
conclusionsThe KEROS program effectively enhances robotic surgical skills through a structured, simulation-based approach. High satisfaction and objective skill improvement support its role in robotic surgical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788561What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.