ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2025
Allogeneic Transplant for CMML.
Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewChronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a rare hematologic malignancy at the intersection of myelodysplastic (MDS) and myeloproliferative neoplasms, predominantly affecting older adults. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) remains the only curative option, yet its application is limited by the advanced age and comorbidities of most patients. Recent classification updates and refined prognostic tools, particularly molecularly integrated models like CPSS-Mol have enhanced patient stratification and informed transplant timing. The aim of this review is to highlight the evolving landscape of CMML management, with a focus on the role of allo-HCT. RECENT
findingsNovel studies patients demonstrated that individualized transplant timing significantly improved life expectancy. Optimizing transplant outcomes hinges on several factors:managing pretransplant splenomegaly, choosing appropriate debulking strategies, selecting optimal donors, and tailoring conditioning regimens. New data favor treosulfan-based and thiotepa-busulfan regimens for their favorable toxicity and relapse profiles. Post-transplant, strategies like post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) for GVHD prophylaxis and emerging approaches to minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring offer additional refinements in patient management. While no MRD studies are CMML-specific, extrapolation from MDS supports its role in relapse prediction. Innovative therapies, including hypomethylating agent combinations, venetoclax, targeted inhibitors, and immunotherapies are under active investigation, with potential to improve pre- and post-transplant outcomes. Advancements in molecular classification, dynamic prognostic tools, and therapeutic strategies are reshaping the CMML treatment paradigm. Personalized approaches that integrate genetic risk, patient fitness, and disease characteristics are enabling more effective transplant strategies, with the ultimate goal of extending survival and improving quality of life in this complex and historically difficult-to-treat malignancy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.