ArticlePhysical and engineering sciences in medicine2025
A novel method for measuring the backscatter factor on a curved surface for diagnostic X-rays using a flexible scintillator sheet.
Article in Physical and engineering sciences in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ESD is calculated using the backscatter factor (BSF). However, BSFs for flat surfaces have been used even though simulations have shown that the BSFs for curved surfaces, which represent the human body more accurately, do not match those for flat surfaces. Measuring these values in practice presents a challenge because conventional dosimeters used for BSF measurement have sensitive volumes that cannot conform to curved surfaces. In this study, we measured the BSF for a curved surface using a flexible scintillator. The scintillator, composed of Gd₃Al₂Ga₃O₁₂ (GAGG) scintillator powder mixed with a silicone adhesive, was securely attached to the curved surface of a cylindrical phantom. Diagnostic X-rays were irradiated onto the scintillator, and the BSFs were evaluated as the ratio of the light output with and without the phantom. We successfully measured BSFs on a curved surface using a flexible scintillator. The mean difference between the BSFs obtained from the experiments using the flexible scintillator and those obtained from the simulations for the cylindrical phantom was 0.43%. The maximum difference was 1.47%, which was observed at a tube voltage of 40 kV. Thus, the BSFs measured using the flexible scintillator agree well with the simulated results. Our scintillator is useful for measuring BSFs on curved surfaces and contributes to dose management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788533What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.