ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025
Assessing the carbon footprint of the initial 24 h post-severe trauma admission in a French ICU: a pilot study.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon footprint associated with neonatal intensive care unit admission of very preterm infants: A retrospective pilot study applying life cycle assessment.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Choosing wisely: comparing the carbon footprint of three respiratory sampling techniques for ventilator-associated pneumonia.Annals of intensive care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs healthcare emerges as the world's fifth-largest carbon emitter, intensive care units (ICUs) represent environmental challenges due to their high resource consumption and energy demands. Reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is necessary to limit global warming. This study aimed to quantify the carbon footprint of ICU care during the first 24 h of admission for trauma patients. By establishing a baseline "carbon cost" for ICU trauma care, we seek to provide a framework for future studies assessing sustainable care strategies.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational pilot study in a French trauma ICU, categorizing patients into three standardized care pathways. The GHG emissions have been quantified using a hybrid life cycle assessment approach across various scope categories. Statistical analyses included correlation testing between the different groups and severity scores.
resultsTotal carbon footprints ranged from 86 to 248 kg of CO
conclusionThe carbon footprint of ICU care of a trauma patient during the first 24 h is significant, and it is necessary to conduct assessments in each ICU to identify levers for environmental improvement. The carbon cost should be integrated into the standardization of care and research protocols to enable more sustainable care practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.