ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
The learning curve of robotic cardiac surgery: a scoping review.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prior minimally invasive experience and the robotic mitral valve learning curve: a focused narrative review and the tactile-visual decoupling hypothesis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Extending the Indications for Full Revascularization with Robotic-Assisted Coronary Artery Bypass.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Mapping neurogenic dysphagia diagnostics in Germany: accessibility, implementation practices, and barriers to swallowing endoscopy.Neurological research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aims to investigate the learning curve associated with robotic cardiac surgical procedures and its impact on operative efficiency and patient outcomes. An electronic search of MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases was conducted in October 2023. Studies reporting outcomes of robotic cardiac surgical procedures during the early phase of the learning curve process were included. Intraoperative metrics and clinical outcomes were examined. Following the removal of duplicates, 2305 citations were screened, with 32 studies meeting inclusion criteria for full-text screening. Seven studies focused on totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB), 12 on robotic mitral valve repair (MVR), and 8 on robotic coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Analysis revealed improved procedural efficiency along the learning curve, evidenced by reductions in surgical durations and operative complications. Notable enhancements were observed in total procedure time, bypass time, harvest time, and cross-clamp/occlusion time. Low mortality rates were consistently reported at both 30 days and 1-year post-surgery. As surgeons progress along the learning curve, there is a notable improvement in procedural efficiency and a reduction in adverse events. However, variability in the number of procedures required to attain proficiency suggests the influence of program size and individual surgeon experience. Standardized training protocols and ongoing mentorship are essential to optimize the learning curve while ensuring patient safety. Further research employing standardized metrics to define competency thresholds and expedite the learning process is warranted to enhance the proficiency of robotic cardiac surgeons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.