ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2025
Treatment of Persons with Rheumatoid Arthritis with a History of Cancer.
Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Precision medicine in rheumatoid arthritis: advances and clinical applications of multi-omics biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review article examines the evolving evidence on cancer recurrence and new malignancy risk associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, IL-6 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy. RECENT
findingsConventional synthetic DMARDs are generally considered safe in patients with a history of cancer, with earlier concerns about skin and hematologic malignancies largely disproven. Hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide similarly show no consistent cancer risk. Biologic DMARDs, including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and abatacept, have not been linked to increased cancer recurrence, though caution is advised in patients with a history of skin cancer. Despite supportive evidence, bDMARD use has declined following cancer diagnoses. JAK inhibitors, however, have shown increased risk of lung cancer in older patients with cardiovascular risk factors, prompting cautious use until more data is available. Although large population clinical trials are lacking, current evidence does not demonstrate any increased risk with initiation of csDMARDs, TNF inhibitors, and rituximab in RA patients with a history of cancer. Abatacept and IL-6 inhibitors may also be reasonable options but require further data. JAK inhibitors should be used cautiously until more reliable data becomes available. These findings support cautious but not prohibitive use of bDMARDs in RA patients with a history of cancer, emphasizing individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making. Further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to guide therapy in this complex clinical population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.