Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788505›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2025

Treatment of Persons with Rheumatoid Arthritis with a History of Cancer.

Beeta Shasti-Nazem, Sanyogita Chandra, Jennifer Strouse, Namrata Singh

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Beeta Shasti-NazemResident, Internal Medicine, Legacy Health, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
Sanyogita ChandraResident, Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Jennifer StrouseDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Namrata SinghDepartment of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Seattle, WA, USA. nasingh@uw.edu.

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Douglas Robert Spitz · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
Improving shared decision-making around the use of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cancerK23AR079588 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Namrata Singh · 2022 to 2026
$821k
Impact of rheumatoid arthritis on survival in older adults with cancerR03AG082857 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SINGH, NAMRATA · 2023 to 2024
$289k
National Institute for Aging R03AG082857NCI NIH HHS P30 CA086862NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR079588NIAMS NIH HHS K23AR079588NIA NIH HHS R03 AG082857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review article examines the evolving evidence on cancer recurrence and new malignancy risk associated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, IL-6 inhibitors, and JAK inhibitors, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and a prior malignancy. RECENT

findingsConventional synthetic DMARDs are generally considered safe in patients with a history of cancer, with earlier concerns about skin and hematologic malignancies largely disproven. Hydroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, and leflunomide similarly show no consistent cancer risk. Biologic DMARDs, including TNF inhibitors, rituximab, and abatacept, have not been linked to increased cancer recurrence, though caution is advised in patients with a history of skin cancer. Despite supportive evidence, bDMARD use has declined following cancer diagnoses. JAK inhibitors, however, have shown increased risk of lung cancer in older patients with cardiovascular risk factors, prompting cautious use until more data is available. Although large population clinical trials are lacking, current evidence does not demonstrate any increased risk with initiation of csDMARDs, TNF inhibitors, and rituximab in RA patients with a history of cancer. Abatacept and IL-6 inhibitors may also be reasonable options but require further data. JAK inhibitors should be used cautiously until more reliable data becomes available. These findings support cautious but not prohibitive use of bDMARDs in RA patients with a history of cancer, emphasizing individualized risk assessment and shared decision-making. Further high-quality, prospective studies are needed to guide therapy in this complex clinical population.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidNeoplasmsHumansAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID40788505
PMCPMC13217633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.