Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788491›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2025

Vanishing vacuum disc phenomenon: A diagnostic key in spinal infection.

Fee C Keil, Benjamin Simon Finger, Niklas Laasch, Leonhard Mann, Fatma Kilinc, Marcus Czabanka, Elke Hattingen, Markus Bruder, Christophe T Arendt

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Fee C KeilGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Neuroradiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. fee.keil@unitybox.de.
Benjamin Simon FingerGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Neuroradiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Niklas LaaschGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Neuroradiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Leonhard MannGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Neuroradiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Fatma KilincGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marcus CzabankaGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Neurosurgery, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Elke HattingenGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Neuroradiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Markus BruderKantonspital Aarau, Department of Neurosurgery, Aarau, Switzerland.
Christophe T ArendtGoethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Institute of Neuroradiology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDifferentiating between pyogenic spondylodiscitis (SD) and degenerative disc disease (DDD) can be challenging due to overlapping clinical and radiological features. However, accurate distinction is critical to ensure timely and appropriate treatment and to avoid serious complications. This study aimed to identify imaging features that reliably distinguish pyogenic SD from DDD, including its erosive subtype, in clinical practice.

methodsA total of 163 patients (mean age 62.43 years; 97 males) were evaluated between April 2007 and January 2024: 92 cases with SD (mean age: 67.03 years; 63 males) and 71 controls with DDD (mean age: 57.82 years; 34 males). This retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was conducted at a single centre, using pathogen-confirmed SD as the reference standard. Participants were selected from radiological and clinical databases. Imaging modalities included CT and MRI, with vanishing vacuum disc phenomenon (VVDP) assessed on CT scans obtained prior to the final diagnosis. Statistical comparisons were performed using Chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests.

resultsNo significant differences were observed in the frequency of intervertebral gas between SD and DDD with or without erosive changes (27% vs. 39%, P = 0.137). 99% of SD cases had adjacent phlegmons or abscesses, but none of DDD cases (P < 0.001). Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC) counts differentiated SD from DDD. In a subgroup of 19 subjects with repeated CT scans, VVDP showed 100% diagnostic accuracy in distinguishing SD (10/10) from DDD (0/9) (95% CI: 82.4-100%).

conclusionsBy integrating clinical, serological, and imaging findings, VVDP on repeated scans potentially offers a promising tool for earlier and more accurate diagnosis of infectious spinal conditions.

Indexed as

DiscitisIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTomography, X-Ray ComputedDegenerative disc diseaseSpineSpondylodiscitisTomography, computedVacuum phenomenon

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.