ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2026
A novel Minimally-Invasive technique for Non-Traumatic postoperative adhesive Syringomyelia.
Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pulsatile intraspinal pressure drives post-traumatic syringomyelia: evidence supporting the CSF pulsatile pressure dynamic equilibrium hypothesis.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2026Article
- Thecoperitoneal shunt placement for extensive spinal adhesive arachnoiditis or lumbosacral outlet obstruction with syringomyelia.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCurrent surgical options for treating non-traumatic adhesive syringomyelia, particularly in patients with a history of previous spinal canal surgery, lack clear standardization and frequently lead to common complications such as recurrent adhesions, tube disconnections, and neurological injuries related to myelotomy, resulting in the need for multiple revision surgeries. This study aims to introduce a novel, minimally invasive technique of modified subarachnoid-subarachnoid (S - S) bypass procedure for syringomyelia associated with postoperative arachnoid adhesions and to prospectively evaluate its surgical outcomes.
methodsThis prospective study included 11 consecutive patients with syringomyelia related to postoperative arachnoid adhesions who underwent modified S-S bypass surgery, with a mean follow-up period of 18.3 months (range: 16-20 months). Neurological function was assessed using standardized grading systems, and changes in syrinx size were evaluated using MRI.
resultsTen patients demonstrated clinical improvement, while one patient remained stable. Notably, the preoperative and postoperative ASIA motor and sensory scores showed significant improvement (88.45 ± 11.01 vs. 89.64 ± 9.99, p < 0.05; 200.73 ± 15.52 vs. 203.09 ± 15.29, p < 0.001). The mean syrinx tension index postoperatively was significantly lower than the preoperative value (74.28 ± 14.34% vs. 29.87 ± 17.62%, p < 0.0001), and the syrinx length was also significantly reduced (9.46 ± 4.59 vs. 8.00 ± 6.05, p < 0.05).
conclusionsThis study highlights that the modified S-S bypass can be performed without myelotomy or intratubal interaction with CSF circulation, representing not only a safe and effective surgical technique but also a potentially more physiological approach for treating syringomyelia associated with postoperative arachnoid adhesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788489What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.