SynthesisMolecular biology reports2025
Metagenomic approaches for the quantification of antibiotic resistance genes in swine wastewater treatment system: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Molecular biology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This systematic review aims to identify the metagenomic methodological approaches employed for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) in swine wastewater treatment systems. The search terms used were metagenome AND bacteria AND ("antimicrobial resistance gene" OR resistome OR ARG) AND wastewater AND (swine OR pig), and the search was conducted across the following electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library. The search was limited to studies published between 2020 and 2024. Of the 220 studies retrieved, eight met the eligibility criteria for full-text analysis. The number of publications in this research area has increased in recent years, with China contributing the highest number of studies. ARGs are typically identified using bioinformatics pipelines that include steps such as quality trimming, assembly, metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) reconstruction, open reading frame (ORF) prediction, and ARG annotation. However, comparing ARGs quantification across studies remains challenging due to methodological differences and variability in quantification approaches. Therefore, this systematic review highlights the need for methodological standardization to facilitate comparison and enhance our understanding of antimicrobial resistance in swine wastewater treatment systems through metagenomic approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788461What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.