Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788441›Full record

Trial reportJournal of patient-reported outcomes2025

Assessing participants' experiences with the COVID-19 symptom diary in a clinical trial.

T Michelle Brown, Chisom Kanu, Magdalena Harrington

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05011513 (AN INTERVENTIONAL EFFICACY AND SAFETY, PHASE 2/3, DOUBLE-BLIND, 2 ARM STUDY TO INVESTIGATE ORALLY ADMINISTERED PF 07321332/RITONAVIR COMPARED WITH PLACEBO IN NONHOSPITALIZED SYMPTOMATIC ADULT PARTICIPANTS WITH COVID-19 WHO ARE AT LOW RISK OF PROGRESSING TO SEVERE ILLNESS), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05011513 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

An interventional efficacy and safety, phase 2/3, double-blind, 2 arm study to investigate orally administered pf 07321332/ritonavir compared with placebo in nonhospitalized symptomatic adult participants with covid-19 who are at low risk of progressing to severe illness

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2021 to 2022Enrolled1,440ConditionsCOVID-19ArmsPF-07321332, Ritonavir, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

T Michelle BrownRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Chisom KanuRTI Health Solutions, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Magdalena HarringtonGlobal Access & Value, Pfizer Inc, 66 Hudson Blvd East, Ste 20, New York, NY, 10001, USA. Magdalena.A.Harrington@pfizer.com.

Funding

Pfizer Inc Pfizer Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During a phase 2/3 study of twice-daily nirmatrelvir 300 mg coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg versus placebo for 5 days (NCT05011513), participants reported presence and severity of COVID-19 symptoms using a COVID-19 symptom diary in accordance with FDA guidance. Here, we aimed to evaluate the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items through qualitative interviews as recommended by the FDA. Study participants kept a daily electronic diary to record the presence and severity of 14 COVID-19 symptoms (stuffy or runny nose, sore throat, shortness of breath, cough, low energy or tiredness, muscle or body aches, headache, chills/shivering, feeling hot or feverish, nausea, frequency of vomiting, frequency of diarrhea, sense of smell, and sense of taste). They also answered questions regarding 3 global impression items (return to health, return to usual activities, and overall symptom severity). A subset of clinical trial participants was interviewed at study completion to assess content validity of the diary. Overall, 25 participants were interviewed across 10 clinical sites. Each of the 14 symptoms included in the diary were reported by ≥ 1 participant, with low energy/tiredness being reported most frequently (88.0%). Twelve participants (48.0%) reported ≥ 1 symptom that was not captured by the diary, with dizziness being the most common (12.0%). Rates of these symptoms were lower (≤ 12.0%) than the 14 prespecified symptoms included in the diary (16.0-88.0%). Based on participant feedback, all 14 diary items were clear and generally easy to answer using the response scales, and all were interpreted as intended. The 3 global items received similar feedback, although a few participants noted that there were challenges in interpreting the items, describing questions as "vague" and "confusing", or that responses were too limited; one-third reported having difficulty calculating overall symptom experience for multiple symptoms. Participants reported that the electronic application for the diary and global items was easy to use and enabled the items to be easily completed. Exit interview results support the content validity of the COVID-19 symptom diary and global impression items, with the 14 symptoms included in the diary reflecting the most commonly experienced COVID-19 symptoms. NCT05011513; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05011513 .

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDiaries as TopicAdultAgedFemaleHumansLactamsLeucineMaleMiddle AgedNitrilesProlineRitonavirSARS-CoV-2Severity of Illness IndexLactamsLeucinenirmatrelvirNitrilesProlineRitonavirClinical trialCOVID-19Exit interviewsPatient-reported outcomesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID40788441
PMCPMC12339813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.