ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2025
The Journal of Robotic Surgery at a glance: productivity, impact, and thematic evolution.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- High-flow nasal oxygen in perioperative and critical care: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Prospective study of a structured robotic surgery training program in a public cancer hospital in Brazil.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Trial
- Global trends and hotspots in robot-assisted gastrointestinal endoscopy: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Review
- Surgical Intensity and Specialization Preferences in Healthcare: An Operation- and Process-Management Perspective Using Bibliometric Analysis, Cognitive Mapping and Analytic Network Process (ANP).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most-cited articles published in the Journal of Robotic Surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric evaluation of the Journal of Robotic Surgery (JORS), analyzing its scientific output, thematic evolution, collaboration patterns, and citation performance to support its continued strategic growth in the field of surgical innovation. A total of 2190 articles and reviews published in JORS were retrieved from Scopus (as of July 2025), with 1846 documents receiving 19,031 citations and yielding an h-index of 45. Author productivity analysis revealed ten key contributors with at least 15 publications, led by Patel, V. (26 articles). Their performance was further assessed using advanced bibliometric indicators, including h-index, g-index, m-index, HG Composite, and Q2 Index. Institutional contributions were dominated by North Sichuan Medical College (48 publications), while the United States emerged as the leading national contributor (974 publications), followed by China, the United Kingdom, and Italy. A clear global expansion was noted over time, with the number of contributing countries increasing from 21 in 2007-2010 to 77 by 2021-2025, reflecting growing international collaboration. Thematic mapping using uni-, bi-, and tri-gram keyword analysis highlighted dominant research areas and evolving interests. Citation performance was complemented with SJR and Web of Science metrics, indicating a marked rise in journal impact: Cites per Document increased from 0.769 (2008) to 2.941 (2024), the SJR score rose to 0.764, and the journal impact factor reached 3.0 in 2024. JORS also advanced in journal quartiles, attaining Q1 in Surgery and Q2 in Health Informatics. These findings underscore JORS's growing academic influence and its role as a global platform for advancing robotic surgical science. The hard work of all authors, reviewers, editorial board and honorable editor-in-chief is sincerely appreciated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788431What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.