ArticleUrolithiasis2025
Construction and validation of a urinary stone composition prediction model based on machine learning.
Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Construction of a LASSO regression-based predictive model for recurrence of urinary tract stones.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
- Correspondence regarding: Guo J. et al. Construction and validation of a urinary stone composition prediction model based on machine learning. Urolithiasis 2025;53:154.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Toward reliable preoperative prediction of urinary stone composition: critical considerations for imaging and clinical data integration.Urolithiasis · 2025Article
- Beyond single-center promise: can machine learning models for urinary stone composition deliver broad clinical utility?Urolithiasis · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The composition of urinary calculi serves as a critical determinant for personalized surgical strategies; however, such compositional data are often unavailable preoperatively. This study aims to develop a machine learning-based preoperative prediction model for stone composition and evaluate its clinical utility. A retrospective cohort study design was employed to include patients with urinary calculi admitted to the Department of Urology at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2019 to 2024. Feature selection was performed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression combined with multivariate logistic regression, and a binary prediction model for urinary calculi was subsequently constructed. Model validation was conducted using metrics such as the area under the curve (AUC), while Shapley Additive Explanations(SHAP) values were applied to interpret the predictive outcomes. Among 708 eligible patients, distinct prediction models were established for four stone types: calcium oxalate stones: Logistic regression achieved optimal performance (AUC = 0.845), with maximum stone CT value, 24-hour urinary oxalate, and stone size as top predictors (SHAP-ranked); infection stones: Logistic regression (AUC = 0.864) prioritized stone size, urinary pH, and recurrence history; uric acid stones: LASSO-ridge-elastic net model demonstrated exceptional accuracy (AUC = 0.961), driven by maximum CT value, 24-hour oxalate, and urinary calcium; calcium-containing stones: Logistic regression attained better prediction (AUC = 0.953), relying on CT value, 24-hour calcium, and stone size. This study developed a machine learning prediction model based on multi-algorithm integration, achieving accurate preoperative discrimination of urinary stone composition. The integration of key imaging features with metabolic indicators enhanced the model's predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40788405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.