Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788353›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2025

Parental perspectives on the use of tumor molecular profiling and germline genetic testing during their children's cancer treatment.

Marcelo M Sleiman, Muriel R Statman, Mary Rose Yockel, Yelena P Wu, Jada G Hamilton, Wendy K Kohlmann, Jennie Vagher, Soren Feola, Luke D Maese, Jing Chen and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Marcelo M SleimanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Muriel R StatmanLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Mary Rose YockelThe Catholic University of America, Washington, DC, USA.
Yelena P WuHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jada G HamiltonMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Wendy K KohlmannHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jennie VagherHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Soren FeolaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Luke D MaeseHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jing ChenChildren's Cancer Institute, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Burton AppelChildren's Cancer Institute, Hackensack Meridian Health, Hackensack, NJ, USA.
Casey J MehrhoffHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Beth N PeshkinLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Nina S Kadan-LottickLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Gary M KupferLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Kenneth P TercyakLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. tercyakk@georgetown.edu.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI SELWYN M VICKERS · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Tissue Culture Shared ResourceP30CA051008 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI MARCUS S NOEL · 1990 to 2026
$71.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NCI NIH HHS P30 CA051008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor molecular profiling (TMP) with germline genetic testing (GGT) is becoming standard practice in pediatric cancer care. Yet, little is known about parents' understanding of these practices, or testing's psychosocial risks and benefits. This study characterized parental knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about TMP and GGT. A cross-sectional, mixed-methods study was conducted among N = 75 parents of children with cancer. Parents completed a survey on cancer-related knowledge, attitudes toward GGT, psychological stress, communication, and decision-making. A subset (N = 31, 41%) then completed interviews about TMP and GGT that were content-coded and interpreted in light of survey findings. Correlative analyses indicated that parents' greater understanding of cancer and genetics was associated with favorable attitudes toward GGT (r = 0.34), preferences for more information about GGT results (r = 0.56) and reduced decisional regret about GGT (r = -0.61). Families who communicated less openly held more favorable views on GGT (r = -0.38) and preferred more information about GGT (r = -0.39), but had children who were more anxious (r = -0.36). Parents who were more anxious (r = 0.40) and who favored GGT (r = 0.41) also had children who were more anxious (all p's < 0.05). Thematically, most parents recalled their children's test results (94%), but recollection of testing type was suboptimal (58% for TMP, 61% for GGT). Nearly 70% believed it would be helpful to speak to other families for psychosocial support; additional potential resources included healthcare providers (31%) and websites (23%). When children with cancer undergo TMP and/or GGT, their parents would benefit psychoeducational resources to improve outcomes.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNeoplasmsParentsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDecision MakingFemaleGerm-Line MutationHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesCancerChildrenGenetic testingParentsPsychosocial

Identifiers

PMID40788353
PMCPMC13048831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.