ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2025
Beyond borders: engineering organ-targeted immunotherapies to overcome site-specific barriers in cancer.
Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatiotemporal cancer controlNanomedicine (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organ-targeted immunotherapy is emerging as a transformative strategy to significantly improve the precision, efficacy, and safety of cancer immunotherapy. Tumors frequently arise in, or metastasize to, immunologically unique organs such as the brain, liver, and lungs-each presenting formidable barriers that impede uniform treatment success. These organs not only represent common metastatic sites but also host distinct immune microenvironments that demand customized therapeutic approaches. Nanovaccine-based immunotherapies have recently gained traction as a promising solution to overcome these organ-specific challenges. The brain, protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), limits immune cell infiltration and drug penetration, especially in aggressive cancers like glioblastoma (GBM). The liver, characterized by its immune-tolerant landscape and dense population of phagocytic cells, suppresses antitumor responses in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Meanwhile, the lungs' vast vasculature and continuous exposure to airborne antigens necessitate precision delivery strategies to trigger robust immunity without provoking excessive inflammation. To surmount these hurdles, nanocarriers have been engineered to leverage passive targeting through the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect, active targeting via organ-specific ligands, immune cell hitchhiking, and stimuli-responsive release mechanisms. These innovations enable nanovaccines to elicit localized immune activation, reshape the tumor microenvironment (TME), and enhance cytotoxic T-cell responses. This review underscores the critical importance and urgent need for continued development of organ-specific nanovaccine platforms. It calls for intensified research efforts to translate these technologies into clinically viable therapies capable of addressing the most immunologically challenging tumor sites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.