ArticleJACC. Case reports2025
Double-Chambered Left Ventricle: How Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Overturned the Diagnosis.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Double-chambered left ventricle: a rare congenital anomaly.Journal of echocardiography · 2026Article
- Double-chambered left ventricle with advanced biventricular failure: a case report.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDouble-chambered left ventricle (DCLV) is a rare congenital heart anomaly and can be easily misdiagnosed with transthoracic echocardiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can help in the diagnostic process and risk stratification. CASE SUMMARY: A 15-year-old girl diagnosed with left ventricular noncompaction and unsustained ventricular tachycardia was referred to our institution for further characterization. The CMR scan demonstrated instead a DCLV with normal ejection fraction and tissue characterization parameters within normal limits. The patient was started on bisoprolol, which was effective in reducing the arrhythmic burden, and she is currently under regular follow-up. DISCUSSION: DCLV has been described only in anecdotal case reports since the first classification was published in 1981. In our case, a prominent paraseptal trabecula was the anatomical fingerprint, but it could not be properly identified with transthoracic echocardiography. CMR instead was pivotal in the diagnosis, which allowed us to properly identify the morphology of the left ventricle and provided tissue characterization, therefore refining arrhythmic risk stratification. In addition, it excluded other differential diagnosis such as ventricular septal defects. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: This case highlights the importance of CMR in the diagnosis of rare congenital cardiac abnormalities, such as DCLV, especially when the echocardiographic window is suboptimal or unclear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.