ArticleJournal of surgical oncology2025
Evolving Trends in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction With Autologous Tissues: A Large-Scale, 24-Year Retrospective Study in China.
Article in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal Trends in Autologous Breast Reconstruction Among Patients With Psychiatric Diagnoses: From Disparity to Equity.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Comparative Outcomes of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap and Breast Implants in Breast Reconstruction Postmastectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Surgical Strategies for Unexpected Unilateral Absence of the Latissimus Dorsi Muscle during Breast Reconstruction: A Case Report and Literature Review.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAutologous breast reconstruction (ABR) significantly improves quality of life following mastectomy. However, ABR has traditionally been underutilized compared to implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR), partly due to its technical complexity, longer operative time, and relatively limited reimbursement. This study aimed to evaluate the patterns and evolving trends of ABR in China.
methodsAnnual trends in breast reconstruction at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from 2000 to 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Data included patient demographics, reconstruction timing, flap types, adjuvant radiotherapy status, and reoperations due to complications. Temporal trends were assessed using linear regression analysis.
resultsAmong 6,174 unilateral breast reconstruction cases, 2,123 (34.39%) involved ABR. Latissimus dorsi flaps (LDF) were the most commonly used technique overall (59.87%, n = 1,271), while the use of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flaps increased markedly over time. By 2023, DIEP flaps accounted for 56.46% of all ABR procedures, becoming the predominant modality. Their rise was particularly notable in delayed and immediate-delayed reconstructions, as well as in salvage ABR following implant failure. Among patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy, the preference for DIEP flaps also increased significantly. Both LDF and DIEP flaps demonstrated low reoperation rates, highlighting their safety and clinical reliability.
conclusionsAutologous breast reconstruction in China is shifting toward increased utilization of DIEP flaps, particularly in delayed, immediate-delayed, and implant-salvage settings, as well as among patients undergoing radiotherapy. These findings support DIEP as a preferred flap type in modern reconstructive practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.