SynthesisClinical transplantation2025
En Bloc Heart-Lung Transplantation: Past and Present. A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Clinical transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- En Bloc Heart-Lung Transplantation: Past and Present. A Systematic Review.Clinical transplantation · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEn bloc heart-lung transplantation (HLTx) has been utilized for the past 50 years for the treatment of end-stage heart and lung disease, with significant evolution in the field over that time. This is a systematic review of HLTx and a description of the evolution and outcomes in this patient population.
methodsPubmed and Embase were searched for all articles on HLTx from the time of database inception. A total of 1513 articles were screened, and after exclusion, 29 were included in this systematic review.
resultsReported cases of HLTx were more common in the early era (before 2000), for the indications of cystic fibrosis, Eisenmenger's syndrome, and pulmonary hypertension. In the contemporary era (2000-present), patients were not as commonly transplanted for cystic fibrosis, with pulmonary hypertension and congenital heart disease comprising the majority of cases. Rates of short-term mortality tended to be lower in more recent studies, with only recent studies reporting long-term survival. DISCUSSION: HLTx has evolved substantially. In tandem with isolated heart and lung transplantation, the indications for transplant, medical therapy, and outcomes have changed over time. While HLTx is used less frequently in contemporary times compared to the early days of cardiothoracic transplantation, indications for HLTx continue to exist, and the use of HLTx will continue to be indicated. Centers with experience in HLTx should continue to report trends in patient management and outcomes, to continue to guide continued refinement in the field of HLTx.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.