ArticleIndian dermatology online journal2025
Insights into the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Psoriasis Treatment Strategies: A Mini Review.
Article in Indian dermatology online journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractPsoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting millions of people globally, with prevalence varying significantly between countries. Conventional treatments, including topical agents, phototherapy, and systemic medications, often fail to account for individual variability, leading to suboptimal outcomes and potential adverse effects. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance precision and personalization in psoriasis management, potentially transforming diagnostic accuracy and treatment selection. This review examines the integration of AI across multiple domains of psoriasis treatment: (1) machine learning algorithms for phototherapy outcome prediction, (2) deep learning techniques for lesion segmentation and severity assessment, (3) AI-enhanced remote photographic monitoring systems, and (4) predictive modeling for response to systemic therapies and biologics. The analysis encompasses various AI methodologies, including random forest classifiers, convolutional neural networks, multiscale superpixel clustering, and gradient-boosted decision trees applied to clinical datasets, imaging analysis, and multi-omic patient data. AI-driven models demonstrate significant clinical utility with phototherapy outcome prediction, achieving high sensitivity (>84%) and accuracy (75-85%). Automated lesion segmentation reaches 86.99%-pixel accuracy, while remote AI assessments strongly correlate with clinical evaluations (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient [ICC] = 0.78-0.99). Notably, predictive models can forecast biologic therapy responses with > 95% accuracy within 2-4 weeks of treatment initiation, substantially reducing evaluation timelines from the conventional 12-week assessment period. AI technologies offer transformative potential in psoriasis management by enabling precise diagnosis, outcome prediction, and personalized therapy selection. Current implementations show promising results across diverse clinical applications, from phototherapy optimization to biologic response prediction. While challenges in dataset diversity, standardization, and validation remain, these represent opportunities for further advancement toward precision medicine in dermatology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.