Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788093›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2025

All you need to know about equipment validation for sterility testing.

James E T Gebo, Kayla M Feehely, Chase E Lattimore, Dylan P Mogavero, Anna F Lau

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James E T GeboSterility Testing Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kayla M FeehelySterility Testing Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Chase E LattimoreSterility Testing Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Dylan P MogaveroSterility Testing Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Anna F LauSterility Testing Service, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8205-9978

Funding

HHS | NIH | Clinical Center | Intramural Research Program (IRP)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Product sterility testing requests are becoming increasingly common in clinical microbiology laboratories due to the rapid development of advanced therapies. Most laboratory directors are hesitant to bring on such tests because they fall under current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP) regulated by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA), where expectations differ from clinical requirements (regulated by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services). When considerations are made for cGMP testing in the clinical lab, most focus is placed on analytical test validation. In this mini-review, we provide an overview of one critical element within the cGMP quality system-validation of equipment, software, and systems through installation, operational, and performance qualification (IQ, OQ, and PQ or IOPQ). This terminology is not common in clinical laboratories, and the IQ and OQ portions are often overlooked, not performed, and/or not documented, although phase II CAP requirements exist (COM.30550 and COM.30575). This mini-review will provide an overview of the IOPQ framework, what is included and how it differs from CAP requirements, important considerations for an IOPQ, and a summary of FDA citations relating to equipment validation. We provide examples using blood culture systems, controlled temperature units (CTUs; e.g., incubator), and the laboratory information management system, given their likelihood for use in cGMP activities in the clinical lab. Importantly, the IOPQ requirements summarized here would have also been relevant to laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) classified as "devices" prior to the March 31, 2025, annulment of the ruling.

Indexed as

Laboratories, ClinicalMicrobiological TechniquesSterilizationHumansQuality ControlUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administrationcellular therapycGMPequipmentIOPQqualificationsterility testingvalidation

Identifiers

PMID40788093
PMCPMC12421869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.