Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40788041›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2025

Decoding non-human mammalian adaptive signatures of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 to assess its human adaptive potential.

Ranjana Nataraj, Avinash Karkada Ashok, Ayushi Amin Dey, Sannula Kesavardhana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ranjana NatarajDepartment of Biochemistry, Division of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Avinash Karkada AshokDepartment of Biochemistry, Division of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Ayushi Amin DeyDepartment of Biochemistry, Division of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sannula KesavardhanaDepartment of Biochemistry, Division of Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9536-8830

Funding

Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India BT/PR45145/COT/142/24/2022Indian Council of Medical Research EMDR/SG/9/2023-2019Indian Council of Medical Research IIRPSG-2024-01-01943Science and Engineering Research Board EEQ/2021/000274STARS-MoE India MoE-STARS/STARS-2/2023-0464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 2.3.4.4b clade highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 infected diverse non-human mammalian species, gained mammal-to-mammal transmission potential, and caused sporadic human infections. However, whether non-human mammals enable the human adaptation of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 to establish human infections is unclear. Gain-of-function research restrictions may hinder the assessment of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 human adaptations. Here, we tracked the evolution of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 that infected non-human mammals and evaluated their ability to gain human adaptations. The non-human mammal 2.3.4.4b H5N1 partly acquired classical human-adapting mutations, which are identical to the residues of H1N1pdm09 and seasonal human H3N2 viruses, while showing a few species-specific adaptations that might be potential barriers for successful human infections. The polymerase complex proteins, PA and PB2, acquired human adaptations in non-human mammals, with fox-infected viruses showing more positive selection in the polymerase complex. The human-adapting Q591K/R substitution in PB2 appeared only in the 2.3.4.4b clade but not in previously circulating H5N1 strains. Despite minimal changes in hemagglutinin (HA), A160T and T199I mutations near the receptor binding site of HA in dairy cattle viruses indicate the rapid HA glycan surface evolution affecting virus entry and immune evasion. The unbiased quantitative assessment of virus adaptations indicated that 2.3.4.4b H5N1 circulating in bears, cattle, dolphins, and foxes might show better human adaptive potential. Thus, 2.3.4.4b H5N1 appears to be acquiring human adaptations due to natural selection pressure in non-human mammals. Overall, our study delineates human adaptation and infection risk of specific non-human mammalian circulating 2.3.4.4b H5N1 strains.IMPORTANCEThe 2.3.4.4b clade H5N1 virus emerged as a panzootic strain, leading to the unprecedented deaths of domestic and wild birds and diverse non-human mammalian species. Intriguingly, the 2.3.4.4b H5N1 transmitted to diverse mammalian species and gained mammal-to-mammal transmission, suggesting its pandemic potential. The H5N1 outbreaks in dairy cattle and sea lions are devastating, and they contributed to sporadic human infections. This indicates the ability of non-human mammal hosts, like dairy cattle, as potential sources for human transmission. However, the signatures of non-human mammal adaptations of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 and how these adaptations drive the human adaptive potential of 2.3.4.4b H5N1 are unclear. In this study, we show the specific molecular patterns of H5N1 proteins that determine species-specific adaptations in non-human mammals. We identified that 2.3.4.4b H5N1 circulating in non-human mammals is rapidly evolving with critical adaptations in PA, PB2, and HA and gaining human adaptive potential in specific non-human mammalian species.

Indexed as

Influenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMammalsOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEvolution, MolecularHumansMutationViral ProteinsViral Proteins2.3.4.4b H5N1avian influenzahemagglutininhost-directed evolutionHPAIshuman adaptationnon-human mammalspanzootic virusvirus evolutionvirus polymerase complex

Identifiers

PMID40788041
PMCPMC12403652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.