ArticleJournal of vision2025
Gloss discrimination: Toward an image-based perceptual model.
Article in Journal of vision, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Human gloss perception reproduced by tiny neural networks.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Material discrimination relies on context-dependent active sensing strategies.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gloss is typically considered the perceptual counterpart of a surface's reflectance characteristics. Yet, asking how discriminable two surfaces are on the basis of surface properties is a poorly posed question, as scene factors other than reflectance can have substantial effects on how discriminable two glossy surfaces are to humans. This difficulty with predicting gloss discrimination has so far hobbled efforts to establish a perceptual standard for surface gloss. Here, we propose an experimental framework for making this problem tractable, starting from the premise that any perceptual standard of gloss discrimination must account for how distal scene variables influence the statistics of proximal image data. With this goal in mind, we rendered a large set of images in which shape, illumination, viewpoint, and surface roughness were varied. For each combination of viewing conditions, a fixed difference in surface roughness was used to create a pair of images showing the same object (from the same viewpoint and under the same lighting) with high and low gloss. Human participants (N = 150) completed a paired comparisons task in which they were required to select image pairs with the largest apparent gloss difference. Importantly, rankings of the scenes derived from these judgments represent differences in perceived gloss independent of physical reflectance. We find that these rankings are remarkably consistent across participants, and are well-predicted by a straightforward Visual Differences Predictor (Daly, 1992; Mantiuk, Hammou, & Hanji, 2023). This allows us to estimate bounds on visual discriminability for a given surface across a wide range of viewing conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.