ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2025
Machine Learning Models for Predicting Treatment-Requiring Retinopathy of Prematurity in the e-ROP Study.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk prediction models for retinopathy of prematurity in preterm infants.Biomedical reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate machine learning (ML) models for predicting treatment-requiring retinopathy of prematurity (TR-ROP) using image findings at 32 to 34 weeks of postmenstrual age, along with demographic and clinical characteristics. Methods: This secondary analysis included 771 infants with a birth weight of less than 1251 g who had at least one imaging session by 34 weeks postmenstrual age and at least one subsequent ROP examination for determining TR-ROP by ophthalmologists in the Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-Phase Retinopathy of Prematurity (e-ROP) Study. Six ML models (K-nearest neighbors, support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, deep neural network [DNN], and transformer) were evaluated for predicting TR-ROP. Prediction performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. Results: Using image findings and demographic and clinical data, ML models achieved AUCs ranging from 0.777 (K-nearest neighbors) to 0.853 (DNN), sensitivity ranging from 0.765 (extreme gradient boosting) to 0.929 (DNN), and specificity ranging from 0.644 (DNN) to 0.698 (transformer). Using image findings alone, the DNN performed best with an AUC of 0.787, sensitivity of 0.729, and specificity of 0.725. Conclusions: ML models using image findings, demographics and clinical characteristics moderately predict TR-ROP, with DNN achieving the highest AUC and sensitivity. Although ML models may provide tools for the early identification of high-risk infants for close monitoring and timely treatment of TR-ROP, future research is needed to improve their performance. Translational Relevance: ML has the potential to predict TR-ROP risk based on early image findings, demographics, and clinical characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.