ArticleBiotechnology progress
Evaluation of triply periodic minimal surface geometries in 3D-printed PLA scaffolds for chondrogenic differentiation.
Article in Biotechnology progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular Mechanisms of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy Mediated by Physical Cues and Therapeutic Strategies in Osteoarthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Evaluation of triply periodic minimal surface geometries in 3D-printed PLA scaffolds for chondrogenic differentiation.Biotechnology progressArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Triply periodic minimal surface (TPMS) scaffolds are gaining attention in tissue engineering due to their continuous and interconnected porous architecture. In this study, three TPMS geometries-Gyroid, Diamond, and I-WP-were fabricated from polylactic acid (PLA) using fused deposition modeling (FDM), with all scaffolds designed to maintain the same overall porosity. Scaffold characterization included scanning electron microscopy (SEM), microcomputed tomography (micro-CT), compressive mechanical testing, and surface wettability analysis. Although porosity was constant, differences in Equivalent Circular Diameter (ECD) values were observed among the geometries, reflecting variations in pore morphology. Adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) were seeded onto the scaffolds and cultured under chondrogenic differentiation conditions for 21 days. Cell viability, gene expression (Col2, Col10, Sox9), and protein levels were assessed using RT-PCR and Western blot. All scaffold geometries supported cell attachment and chondrogenic differentiation to varying degrees. The Diamond geometry showed the highest chondrogenic marker expression at the mRNA level, while the Gyroid geometry promoted more stable protein expression with reduced hypertrophic signaling. These findings demonstrate that scaffold geometry, even under identical material and porosity conditions, can influence stem cell behavior. The results offer valuable insights for optimizing TPMS-based scaffold designs in cartilage tissue engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.