ArticleBiology open2025
A pro-angiogenic and hypoxic zebrafish model as a novel platform for anti-angiogenic drug testing.
Article in Biology open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Emerging Light-Sheet Fluorescence Microscopy for Cardiac Vascular Imaging in Zebrafish.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zebrafish is a valuable model for antiangiogenic drug testing. We hypothesized that the efficacy of antiangiogenic compounds might vary in hypoxic tissue environments compared to normal tissue. To explore this, we established a chemically induced zebrafish model using DMOG, which inhibits prolyl hydroxylases, and a genetic model by knocking out vhl gene via CRISPR/Cas9 to activate hypoxia signaling. In wild-type larvae, the antiangiogenic drug sorafenib inhibited blood vessel growth. However, in the DMOG model and vhl-/- model, no inhibition occurred in sub-intestinal vessel (SIV) upon sorafenib treatment. Also, gene expression analysis showed that the DMOG induced hypoxia had 20-fold increase in phd3 expression, a marker for hypoxia signaling activation, which rose to 65-fold and 280-fold with sorafenib treatment at the concentration 0.1 μM and 0.2 μM, respectively. In the vhl-/- model phd3 expression was found to be increased to 220-fold and reaching up to 400-fold with sorafenib treatment. This increased activation of hypoxia signaling elevated the proangiogenic factors like vegfaa, vegfab and vegfd, which might have protected the SIV region from sorafenib treatment in hypoxic models. This confirms that the hypoxia zebrafish models gained resistance against chemotherapeutic drugs by increasing the cellular hypoxia levels. Thus, our zebrafish model for hypoxia provides evidence that the efficacy of chemotherapy for cancer significantly depends on hypoxic microenvironment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.