ArticleInternational journal of prison health2025
Association between vaccine uptake and SARS-CoV-2 infection among staff at a jail and prison in the USA.
Article in International journal of prison health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis study aims to examine the association between correctional staff occupational characteristics with vaccine uptake and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination rates among 2,016 correctional staff in the Northeast (March 27, 2020 to September 13, 2022) were examined using a cross-sectional design. Using multiple logistic regression, the authors examined vaccination status and demographic and occupational characteristics associated with infection. Logistic regression was used to assess significant predictors of infection and whether the addition of initial vaccination better predicted infection.
findingsAbout 63.9% of staff were vaccinated according to initial vaccination recommendations and 17.4% received at least one additional booster. During the study period, 47.7% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. After adjusting for demographic and occupational characteristics, younger age, male sex, and no receipt of vaccination were significant predictors of infection. After accounting for variance in infection related to significant demographic and occupational factors, the addition of vaccination status better predicted infection among staff. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: Vaccination status differs by staff occupational and demographic characteristics, though vaccination saliently predicts infection when controlling for variance from those characteristics. Findings can inform future vaccine uptake efforts. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: While controlling for important demographic and occupational factors, vaccine uptake predicted lower odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection among correctional staff.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.