Observational studyJournal of rehabilitation medicine2025
Ukrainian war trauma patients abroad: the rehabilitation process in light of language barriers, cultural differences, war, and infection isolation.
Observational study in Journal of rehabilitation medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrative Rehabilitation for War-Related Polytrauma: A Narrative Review of Multidimensional Strategies and Implementation Challenges.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo study the rehabilitation of Ukrainian war trauma patients abroad, focusing on 5 areas of particular interest: communication, cultural differences, infection isolation, psychosocial load, and the rehabilitation process.
designObservational study. SUBJECTS: (i) 14 Ukrainian patients who underwent rehabilitation at Sunnaas Rehabilitation Hospital, Norway; (ii) 15 members of multidisciplinary teams providing war trauma rehabilitation.
methodsCombined methods. PATIENTS: medical file review, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire 8, custom questionnaire on the 5 focal areas. Hospital staff: focus-group interviews.
resultsPatients preferred professional interpreters, while multilingual staff served an additional role in providing psychological support and cultural mediation. All patients experienced infection isolation, and health professionals worried about the added psychological strain this entailed. Patients reported high trust in the therapists and high satisfaction with rehabilitation. Although war and infection isolation were negative influences, patients reported overall good mood. Health professionals reported becoming more skilled at facilitating rehabilitation under these conditions.
conclusionDespite challenges within the 5 areas assessed, providing rehabilitation to patients evacuated from a country at war is feasible and valuable for patients and health professionals. Both patients and health professionals showed willingness to adapt to foreign concepts, perhaps aided by multilingual health professionals acting as cultural mediators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.