Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787711›Full record

ArticleJournal of biochemical and molecular toxicology2025

Biological Activities of Etodolac-Based Hydrazone, Thiazolidinone and Triazole Derivatives on Breast Cancer Cell Lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231.

Sevgi Kocyigit Sevinc, Pelin Çıkla-Süzgün, Pinar Mega Tiber, Ş Güniz Küçükgüzel, Oya Orun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biochemical and molecular toxicology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sevgi Kocyigit SevincDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6404-9880
Pelin Çıkla-SüzgünDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Pinar Mega TiberDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0819-0702
Ş Güniz KüçükgüzelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Fenerbahce University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Oya OrunDepartment of Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

This study was supported by the Scientific Research Project Commission of Marmara University (Project Number: SAG-C-DRP-100914-0321). The funding provided essential financial support for the design, execution, and analysis of experiments, as well as for data collection and interpretation. In particular, the project facilitated the procurement of necessary laboratory materials and the use of advanced laboratory equipment, all of which were crucial for the successful completion of this study.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, several etodolac-based hydrazone, thiazolidinone, and triazole derivatives that we synthesized and characterized in our earlier research were tested against the hormone-responsive breast cell line MCF-7 and the triple-negative MDA-MB-231, as well as the murine origin fibroblast cell line L-929, at varying doses for their effects on cell viability and toxicity and for their inhibitory activity on cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)/prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) formation. Cell viability and apoptosis tests were utilized to assess the anti-cancer potential of etodolac and its derivatives after the cells were exposed to varied concentrations of synthesized compounds for three different time periods. ELISA and Western blot methods were used to detect protein levels. All synthesized compounds demonstrated higher anti-cancer activity at significantly lower doses compared to etodolac (half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] of 0-50 µM range in derivatives versus 0.5-1 mM range in etodolac). Except for SGK 242, which had a major toxic effect on all cells, the chemicals SGK 206 and SGK 217 had a twice-less impact on control murine L-929 fibroblasts. Similar to proliferation, low concentrations of SGK 206 and SGK 217 (25-50 µM) significantly induced apoptosis in breast cancer cells but not in normal cells. Additionally, they inhibited COX-2 protein expression at 50 µM, and SGK 206 inhibited PGE2 release more effectively than etodolac in cancer cells. The results of this study suggest that, in comparison to a healthy control group, the thiazolidinone derivative SGK 206 and the thiazolidinone derivative SGK 217 are more effective than etodolac when it comes to the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231. SGK 206 exhibits a low IC50 value, a distinct dose-response relationship, and strong apoptotic effects, particularly on MDA-MB-231 cells.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBreast NeoplasmsEtodolacHydrazonesThiazolidinesTriazolesAnimalsApoptosisCell SurvivalCyclooxygenase 2DinoprostoneFemaleHumansMCF-7 CellsMiceAntineoplastic AgentsCyclooxygenase 2DinoprostoneEtodolacHydrazonesThiazolidinesTriazolesapoptosisbreast cancercell viabilitycyclooxygenaseetodolacprostaglandin E2

Identifiers

PMID40787711
PMCPMC12337082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.