ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Psychotherapist remarks' ML classifier: insights from LLM and topic modeling application.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utilizing BERTopic modeling for concept discovery in the domain of gerotranscendence and solitude.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2026Article
- Utilizing BERTopic Modeling for Concept Discovery in the Domain of Gerotranscendence and Solitude.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This paper addresses the growing intersection of machine learning (ML) and psychotherapy by developing a classification model for analyzing topics in therapist remarks. Understanding recurring language patterns in therapist communication can enhance clinical practice, supervision, and training, yet systematic approaches to topic analysis remain limited. Methods: The study applies BERTopic, an ML-based topic modeling technique, to unstructured dialogues from two distinct groups of therapists: classical (founders of therapeutic schools such as Carl Rogers, Fritz Perls, and Albert Ellis) and modern practitioners representing diverse psychotherapeutic approaches. The implementation involves constructing a vector space of therapist remarks, applying dimensionality reduction, clustering, and optimizing topic representations. To improve interpretability, expert assessment and manual refinement complement the automated modeling process. The resulting topics are used as features to train an ML classifier, which is then tested on a case study comparing Carl Rogers' sessions with those of modern Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) practitioners. Results: The analysis identifies the most common and stable topics across both therapist groups, highlighting recurring patterns and unique thematic compositions. The case study reveals distinct differences in thematic structures, with key topics emerging that characterize each group's therapeutic discourse. The trained classifier demonstrates robust performance in distinguishing these thematic patterns. Discussion: The study shows that automated topic modeling, combined with expert input, can effectively uncover how therapist language patterns emerge and persist across different therapeutic styles. The resulting model, made publicly available, offers broad applications in psychotherapy research, clinical supervision, and training. These findings underscore the potential of topic modeling as a valuable tool for deepening our understanding of therapist communication and advancing ML applications in psychotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.