ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Exploring disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care among insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan: a comparative cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- JCI Accreditation and Outpatient Surgery: A Scoping Review of Evidence on Healthcare Quality, Risk Management, and Policy.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Neurological Comorbidity Burden, Outcomes, and Disparities in Head and Neck Cancer During COVID-19.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Community-Based Health Insurance Scheme on Patient Satisfaction in Debresina, Primary Hospital, North Shewa Zone, Ethiopia: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Comparative Evaluation of Patient-Reported Experience in Day Surgery Under International JCI and National Accreditation in Kazakhstan.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Does Family Doctor Contracting Improve the Health of the Elderly: An Empirical Study from Beijing, China.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
- Healthcare System Transition in Kazakhstan and Its Impact on Inguinal Hernia Repair Outcomes: A Multidisciplinary Comparative Analysis of TEP, TIPP, and Open Lichtenstein Procedures.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Although crucial, limited research has explored factors contributing to satisfaction disparities in outpatient obstetric-gynecological care, particularly in Kazakhstan. The objective of the study is to explore disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care between insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan, and to identify the key determinants of patient satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 107 insured and uninsured patients over three months in early 2024 at a hospital in the Almaty region, Kazakhstan. Using a five-point Likert scale, a structured questionnaire assessed socio-demographics, patient-reported experiences with the care process, and overall satisfaction across 16 dimensions. The survey instrument was pilot-tested and demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Chi-square tests examined associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified key predictors of patient satisfaction. Results: A multivariable analysis revealed a "satisfaction paradox": insured patients had lower odds of being satisfied compared to uninsured patients (AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81). Specifically, a lack of insurance was associated with higher reported satisfaction in doctor-patient communication (OR = 1.8) and nursing care (OR = 2.1). Other significant predictors of satisfaction included having kidney disease and a shorter hospital stay. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that expanding insurance coverage is necessary for access but insufficient for ensuring patient satisfaction. The observed "satisfaction paradox" highlights that policy must adopt a dual focus: promoting enrolment while simultaneously improving the quality of patient-provider interactions to meet the higher expectations of insured patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.