Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787678›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025

Exploring disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care among insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Sholpan Aliyeva, Vyacheslav Lokshin, Maksut Kamaliev, Sholpan Sarmuldayeva, Gani Kaldybayev, Oxana Tsigengagel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sholpan AliyevaDepartment of Clinical Disciplines, Kazakhstan's Medical University "Kazakhstan School of Public Health", Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Vyacheslav LokshinDepartment of Assisted Reproductive Technologies, International Clinical Centre of Reproduction "PERSONA", Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Maksut KamalievDepartment of Health Management, Kazakhstan's Medical University "Kazakhstan School of Public Health", Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Sholpan SarmuldayevaDepartment of Medicine, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Gani KaldybayevBirth Center, Karasay Clinical Multidisciplinary Central District Hospital, Kaskelen, Kazakhstan.
Oxana TsigengagelDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Information Technologies, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction is a key indicator of healthcare quality. Although crucial, limited research has explored factors contributing to satisfaction disparities in outpatient obstetric-gynecological care, particularly in Kazakhstan. The objective of the study is to explore disparities in satisfaction with obstetric-gynecological care between insured and uninsured women in Almaty, Kazakhstan, and to identify the key determinants of patient satisfaction. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 107 insured and uninsured patients over three months in early 2024 at a hospital in the Almaty region, Kazakhstan. Using a five-point Likert scale, a structured questionnaire assessed socio-demographics, patient-reported experiences with the care process, and overall satisfaction across 16 dimensions. The survey instrument was pilot-tested and demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.83). Chi-square tests examined associations, and multivariable logistic regression identified key predictors of patient satisfaction. Results: A multivariable analysis revealed a "satisfaction paradox": insured patients had lower odds of being satisfied compared to uninsured patients (AOR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81). Specifically, a lack of insurance was associated with higher reported satisfaction in doctor-patient communication (OR = 1.8) and nursing care (OR = 2.1). Other significant predictors of satisfaction included having kidney disease and a shorter hospital stay. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that expanding insurance coverage is necessary for access but insufficient for ensuring patient satisfaction. The observed "satisfaction paradox" highlights that policy must adopt a dual focus: promoting enrolment while simultaneously improving the quality of patient-provider interactions to meet the higher expectations of insured patients.

Indexed as

healthcare disparitieshealth equityhealth insuranceKazakhstanobstetrics and gynecologyoutpatientspatient satisfactionsocioeconomic factors

Identifiers

PMID40787678
PMCPMC12331730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.