ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Optimizing Alzheimer's disease prediction through ensemble learning and feature interpretability with SHAP-based feature analysis.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The SHAP Has Sailed: Explainable Machine Learning Meets Endoscopic Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Non-pancreatic Periampullary Lesions.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- FLAME: Federated Learning and Aggregated Multi-Model Ensemble for Multi-Class Alzheimer's Disease Stage Classification from Structured Clinical Data.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable Patient-Level Cognitive Impairment Screening via Temporal, Semantic, and Psycholinguistic Multimodal AI.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Insulin Resistance Surrogates and Cognitive Impairment in Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study with Interpretable Machine Learning.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- FUSION-AD: interpretable AI framework for risk assessment and subgroup discovery in Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2026Article
- Optimizing Alzheimer's disease prediction through ensemble learning and feature interpretability with SHAP-based feature analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia (Amsterdam, Netherlands)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder and the leading cause of dementia. Early diagnosis is vital. We developed an interpretable machine learning (ML) model for early AD prediction using open clinical data.
methodsData from 2149 adults (60-90 years) were obtained from Kaggle. After preprocessing and feature engineering, tree-based models were trained. A stacking ensemble model combining Gradient Boosting and XGBoost was trained, with Logistic Regression as the meta-learner. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) provided interpretability. Performance was measured by accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, ROC and AUC.
resultsThe stacked ensemble achieved 97% accuracy (AUC 0.97), with 0.97 precision, 0.94 recall, and 0.96 F1 score for AD. SHAP identified memory complaints, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), functional assessment, behavioral symptoms, cholesterol, and lifestyle factors (activity, diet, sleep) as top predictors.
conclusionThe ensemble model, enhanced by SHAP analysis, provides accurate and interpretable AD risk predictions with potential applicability in future clinical decision support systems. Highlights: Developed an ensemble machine learning (ML) model for early Alzheimer's disease (AD) prediction.Achieved 97% accuracy using stacked XGBoost and Gradient Boosting.SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified key cognitive and lifestyle-related risk factors.Model interprets AD risk using explainable artificial intelligence (AI) for clinical applicability.Utilized open-access dataset to ensure reproducibility and transparency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.