ArticleArthroplasty today2025
Physical Function Following Megaprosthesis Surgery in the Lower Limb-A Prospective Cohort Study of 38 Patients.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Outcomes over 30 years after megaprosthetic reconstruction of the lower limb following tumor resection: a retrospective case series of 10 patients.Japanese journal of clinical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Limited knowledge exists on early outcomes postmegaprosthesis surgery. Yet, understanding these outcomes is crucial for patient counseling. This prospective study investigates physical function outcomes in lower limb megaprosthesis surgery patients, employing both objective and subjective measures and explores associations between them. Methods: A total of 38 patients underwent treatment with a proximal femur, distal femur, or proximal tibia megaprosthesis. Muscle strength tests, range of motion, Timed Up and Go test, and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score were conducted at 4, 8, and 12-18 months postsurgery. Repeated measurements analysis was performed along with a comparison between treated limb, untreated limb, and predictive values. Results: Bilateral muscle strength reduction was observed, with the proximal tibia group showing the most pronounced deficits. None of the groups exhibited changes in strength over time. All groups had decreased joint flexion in the treated limb compared to the untreated limb 12-18 months postsurgery. Timed Up and Go performance improved in all groups, but remained below average compared to reference values. An association was observed between a lower Timed Up and Go Test and higher Musculoskeletal Tumor Society scores, with the latter being lowest in the proximal tibia group. Conclusions: This study provides comprehensive first-year outcome data following megaprosthesis surgery, offering valuable information to guide patient care. Markedly reduced strength in both treated and untreated limbs compared to predicted normal values was observed. The significant deficit in walking ability was clearly associated with patient-reported outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.