Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787584›Full record

ReviewNPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience2025

A practical guide to sequencing in neuropsychiatric research.

Adelaide R Minerva, Michael DeBerardine, Rixing Lin, Hye Ji J Kim, Forrest D Rogers, Rebekah L Rashford, Catherine J Peña

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPP - digital psychiatry and neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Adelaide R Minerva *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
Michael DeBerardine *Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
Rixing LinPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
Hye Ji J KimPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
Forrest D RogersPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
Rebekah L RashfordPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.
Catherine J PeñaPrinceton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA.

Funding

Epigenetic priming of response to future stressorsR01MH129643 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine Jensen Pena · 2022 to 2026
$3.8M
Neurobiology of Paternal CareF32HD110180 · NICHD · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Forrest Dylan Rogers · 2023 to 2026
$235k
Promoting Resilience to Early Life Stress through Epigenetic EditingF31MH131351 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI RASHFORD, REBEKAH · 2022 to 2023
$58k
NICHD NIH HHS F32 HD110180NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH131351NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH129643
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technology and computational analysis to profile RNA and DNA at genome-wide scale has rapidly evolved in the last two decades, with a concomitant rise in their application within neuroscience and psychiatry research. These technologies initially offered "unbiased" insights and the potential to discover previously unconsidered molecular mediators of disease and development. The more recent advent and adoption of single-cell/nucleus and spatial "omics" sequencing provides unprecedented insights into cellular processes within heterogeneous tissues. These advances are especially advantageous in neuropsychiatric research, which faces unique challenges due to the brain's cellular heterogeneity, dynamic development, and the complex, polygenic nature of many psychiatric disorders. Still, different sequencing techniques are better suited for different questions and the most fine-grained (and expensive) approaches are not always necessary. Here, we offer a simple primer on the pros, cons, and best applications for currently available sequencing technologies.

Indexed as

Genome informaticsSequencing

Identifiers

PMID40787584
PMCPMC12331514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.