ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Advancements in endoscopic closure techniques for gastrointestinal luminal defects comparative perspectives on OTSC, endo suturing, TTS clips, and X-Tack.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07625189 (Prospective Observational Registry of EUS-Guided Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Observational Registry of EUS-Guided Ablation (RFA and MWA) for Pancreatic and Other Gastrointestinal Lesions
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prophylactic wound closure after ESD significantly reduces post-ESD bleeding: stratified and meta-regression analyses by tumor size and rectal proportion.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Endoscopic clip systems for hemostasis and defect closure in gastrointestinal endoscopy.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gastrointestinal (GI) defects pose a significant clinical challenge, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare costs. Endoscopic closure techniques have emerged as effective and minimally invasive approaches to manage these defects. This review explores the various endoscopic techniques, including over-the-scope clips (OTSC), endo suturing systems, through-the-scope (TTS) clips, and the X-Tack system. Each technique offers distinct advantages and limitations, making it suitable for specific clinical scenarios. While these devices have demonstrated promising results in clinical practice, further research is needed to optimize their use and address knowledge gaps. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are essential to establish evidence-based guidelines for device selection and procedural techniques. By embracing technological advancements and addressing research limitations, the field of endoscopic closure devices has the potential to revolutionize GI care, leading to improved patient outcomes and expanded therapeutic possibilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.