ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Navigating high-risk PCI with axillary impella support: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- First Report of Hybrid Brachial Artery Access Enabling Complex Coronary Intervention.Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in high risk patients with complex coronary artery disease and impaired left ventricular function pose significant procedural challenges. During such interventions. Mechanical circulatory support with the Impella device has become an effective strategy to maintain hemodynamic stability. While femoral access is traditionally used, alternative routes like axillary artery access may be necessary in patients with peripheral vascular disease. Case presentation: We present the case of a 68-year-old male with severe multivessel coronary artery disease with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and bilateral iliofemoral artery disease. Since there was difficulty in accessing the femoral arteries, axillary artery access was used to insert an Impella CP device to support high-risk PCI. The procedure involved successful revascularization of complex lesions using rotational atherectomy and stenting. The patient remained hemodynamically stable throughout and recovered without complications. Discussion: In patients with contraindications to femoral access this case highlights the feasibility and clinical utility of axillary access for Impella insertion despite requiring surgical expertise and meticulous planning, the axillary route offers a safe and effective alternative for mechanical circulatory support during complex coronary interventions. Conclusion: Axillary artery access for Impella-assisted high-risk PCI is a viable and underutilized option in select patients with complex coronary anatomy and peripheral vascular disease, expanding the therapeutic possibilities in advanced interventional cardiology. This report highlights a safe, effective alternative for patients with contraindications to femoral access and emphasizes the importance of multidisciplinary planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.