ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Percutaneous, transpapillary, and transmural drainage in acute cholecystitis: a comparative analysis of techniques, stent selection, and clinical.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07625189 (Prospective Observational Registry of EUS-Guided Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Prospective Observational Registry of EUS-Guided Ablation (RFA and MWA) for Pancreatic and Other Gastrointestinal Lesions
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultrasound-guided percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of ultrasound · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute cholecystitis is a common inflammatory condition of the gallbladder, primarily caused by gallstone obstruction, leading to increased intraluminal pressure, ischemia, and infection. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the standard treatment, gallbladder drainage techniques have emerged as effective alternatives for high-risk surgical patients. This review explores the indications, techniques, and comparative outcomes of various gallbladder drainage methods, including percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage, particularly with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), has shown high clinical success rates with fewer complications compared to traditional methods. Advances in stent technology and procedural techniques continue to improve patient outcomes. However, further research is needed to establish long-term efficacy and determine optimal patient selection criteria for different drainage methods. The review highlights the evolving landscape of gallbladder drainage and the need for standardized guidelines to optimize treatment strategies for high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.