Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40787544›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Percutaneous, transpapillary, and transmural drainage in acute cholecystitis: a comparative analysis of techniques, stent selection, and clinical.

Zim Warda Hasan, Tusneem Shehzadi, Anmol Mohan, Asad Ur Rehman, Fnu Muskan, Mariam Zia, Priyanka Mohan Lal, Hasibullah Aminpoor, Hasiba Karimi, Vikash Kumar and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07625189 (Prospective Observational Registry of EUS-Guided Ablation), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07625189 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prospective Observational Registry of EUS-Guided Ablation (RFA and MWA) for Pancreatic and Other Gastrointestinal Lesions

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorWest Virginia UniversityRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsRFA, Microwave Ablation, Pancreatic Lesion, Gastrointestinal Lesions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zim Warda HasanClinical and Translational Science, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Tusneem ShehzadiDepartment of Medicine, University College of medicine and dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.
Anmol MohanCarle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, IL, USA.
Asad Ur RehmanIndependent Medical College Faisalabad, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Fnu MuskanJinnah Sindh Medical University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mariam ZiaAkhtar Saeed Medical and Dental College, Lahore, Pakistan.
Priyanka Mohan LalZiauddin University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hasibullah AminpoorKabul University of Medical Sciences, Kabul, Afghanistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1817-7800
Hasiba KarimiBezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7618-3849
Vikash KumarThe Brooklyn Hospital Center, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0058-2421
Usha TejwaneyValley Health System, New Jersey, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5645-1861
Sarwan KumarWayne State University, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute cholecystitis is a common inflammatory condition of the gallbladder, primarily caused by gallstone obstruction, leading to increased intraluminal pressure, ischemia, and infection. While laparoscopic cholecystectomy remains the standard treatment, gallbladder drainage techniques have emerged as effective alternatives for high-risk surgical patients. This review explores the indications, techniques, and comparative outcomes of various gallbladder drainage methods, including percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), endoscopic transpapillary gallbladder drainage (ETGBD), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD). Endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural gallbladder drainage, particularly with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), has shown high clinical success rates with fewer complications compared to traditional methods. Advances in stent technology and procedural techniques continue to improve patient outcomes. However, further research is needed to establish long-term efficacy and determine optimal patient selection criteria for different drainage methods. The review highlights the evolving landscape of gallbladder drainage and the need for standardized guidelines to optimize treatment strategies for high-risk patients.

Indexed as

acute cholecystitisclinical outcomesendoscopic gallbladder drainagegallbladder drainage

Identifiers

PMID40787544
PMCPMC12333829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.