ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Epipericardial fat necrosis: a rare case of chest pain and key learning points.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Epipericardial Fat Necrosis in COVID-19-A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Epipericardial fat necrosis is a rare, self-limiting cause of acute pleuritic chest pain that is frequently misdiagnosed due to its clinical similarities with more serious cardiopulmonary conditions. Early recognition of its characteristic imaging features is essential to avoid unnecessary diagnostic procedures and treatments. Case presentation: A 27-year-old male presented with progressive retrosternal chest pain lasting 24 hours. The initial evaluation was unremarkable except for subtle blunting of the cardiophrenic angles. His symptoms improved after receiving an anti-inflammatory injection but recurred several hours later. Repeated investigations remained normal. Chest computed tomography revealed an ovoid fat-density lesion with a soft-tissue rim and surrounding inflammatory changes in the pericardial region, consistent with epipericardial fat necrosis. A retrospective review of the initial chest radiograph identified subtle but supportive findings. Conservative treatment with oral anti-inflammatory medication led to the complete resolution of symptoms within one week. Discussion: Epipericardial fat necrosis is a benign and under-recognized condition that can mimic life-threatening causes of chest pain, such as pulmonary embolism, acute coronary syndrome, or pericarditis. Computed tomography is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosis. Treatment is conservative and typically results in full recovery. Conclusion: Epipericardial fat necrosis should be considered in the differential diagnosis of acute chest pain when initial evaluations are inconclusive. Increased clinical awareness and accurate interpretation of imaging findings are crucial for prompt diagnosis and the avoidance of unnecessary interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.