ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Evaluating limb salvage with sciatic nerve sacrifice: oncologic outcome, functional recovery, and patient satisfaction: a case series.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the oncologic and functional outcomes in a retrospective case series of 14 patients undergoing sciatic nerve resection as part of limb-sparing surgery for soft tissue sarcomas involving the gluteal region and posterior thigh. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 14 patients treated between 2019 and 2022, each undergoing sciatic nerve resection to achieve oncologic margins. Tumor characteristics were reviewed, including histology, grade, size, and surgical margins. Functional outcomes were assessed using Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores and additional metrics such as ambulation status, device dependence, and patient satisfaction. Results: The median tumor size was 12 cm, with nine high-grade tumors identified. An R0 margin was obtained in 93% (13/14) of patients. At a median follow-up of 40 months, local recurrence-free survival was 86% (12/14 patients). Five patients (36%) developed distant metastases; the overall survival rate at 3 years was 71% (10/14 patients). Functionally, 9 patients (64%) regained ambulatory function using orthotic devices, achieving a median MSTS score of 21/30 (70%, indicating moderate disability). Chronic neuropathic pain occurred in 43% (6/14) of patients, and 71% (10/14) experienced chronic leg edema. Nonetheless, all patients reported high satisfaction with limb preservation. Conclusion: Sciatic nerve resection during limb-sparing surgery provides effective local tumor control and allows for limb preservation despite notable functional impairment. Patient satisfaction remains high, supporting this approach as a potentially oncologically safe and acceptable alternative to amputation, which warrants further validation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.