ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
A Comparative Analysis of Global Responses to Monkeypox Outbreaks: Lessons Learned and Future Directions - a Mini Narrative Review.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mpox Awareness and Knowledge Among Residents of the Northern Border Region, Saudi Arabia: Implications for Community Preparedness.Journal of community health · 2026Article
- Insights into Monkeypox Virus: Host Immunity, Viral Immune Evasion, Recent Advances in Vaccines, Therapeutic Development, and Future Perspectives.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The widespread of Mpox, a zoonotic disease, beyond its endemic regions and declaration of Mpox as a public health emergency by WHO, has raised a global concern. This study aims to compare and analyze the response of various regions across the globe to recent Mpox outbreaks, identify key lessons learned, and propose future strategies to improve public health preparedness. Methods: We conducted a narrative review using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus to identify peer-reviewed articles and official reports published between 2022 and 2024. Countries were selected based on geographic diversity, incidence rates, and data availability. Key comparison parameters included timing of interventions, vaccine rollout, public awareness, diagnostic capacity, and resource allocation. A regionally stratified, thematic analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness of national responses to the Mpox outbreak. Results: The analysis indicates that there is a high degree of dispersion in the measured outcomes of responses. Countries with a pre-implemented vaccination plan like the UK and USA presented with much lower infection rate than the countries that took reactive measures. Awareness activities in high-risk areas, together with quarantine measures, caused a tremendous reduction of transmission. Nevertheless, there were visible chinks in the knowledge-sharing and funding in global health and this led to higher incidence of infection among the communities with limited access to resources like Nigeria and DRC. Conclusion: This narrative review demonstrates the importance of customized global coordination and flexibility of public health responses when dealing with emerging infectious diseases. The different regional responses underscore the essentiality of nuanced interventions, early detection, and effective public health messaging. While some territories have been highly proactive and shown excellent management of the situation, others are struggling with resource constraints and a less well-informed population. Future efforts to provide disaster relief should place a greater emphasis on global collaboration, health system strengthening, and training public health professionals. The world can draw lessons from what has worked well or not so well with the current Mpox response to help prepare and mitigate future public health emergency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.