ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
The effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab for the treatment of pemphigus vulgaris: a cohort study based on a registry database.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ofatumumab, a fully human anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody administered subcutaneously and indicated for multiple sclerosis, might theoretically be effective for patients with pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ofatumumab in patients with PV. Methods: This cohort study was based on a registry database of autoimmune bullous diseases at West China Hospital (AIBD-WCH), including two groups. One was ofatumumab (OFA) group, involving patients receiving ofatumumab subcutaneous injections (2×20mg, 2 weeks apart) and systemic glucocorticoids with/without immunosuppressant. The glucocorticoids control (GC) group was matched using propensity score matching in a 1:2 ratio based on sex, age and body mass index. Both groups completed regular follow-up for 52 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving complete remission during therapy (CRDT) at week 52. Secondary endpoints included maintaining treatment (MT) with daily prednisone doses <0.2 mg/kg/d, relapse rate, the change of pemphigus disease area index and cumulative glucocorticoid doses. Safety results were also collected. Results: Sixteen and thirty-two patients were included in OFA and GC groups, respectively. At week 52, more patients in OFA group achieved CRDT (31.2% versus 3.12%, Conclusions: Ofatumumab combined with glucocorticoids demonstrated favorable effectiveness compared with GC group, without increasing severe adverse events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.